SALEM, OR (KPTV) - Officers and some wildlife experts at odds over the death of a bobcat kitten in Eugene testified Wednesday at a hearing at the Oregon State Capitol.

The 6-month old bobcat was bludgeoned to death by an Oregon State trooper last month after it entered Oak Hill School in Eugene as was trapped there by staff. OSP says the animal was euthanized humanely, while others describe the killing as brutal.

The Lane County Sheriff’s Office responded to the school Oct. 16 and got the cat out of the school and into a patrol vehicle before OSP arrived. What happened next is what has captured the state’s attention.

“We decided that it was important to undertake a fact-finding hearing to find out exactly what went on and how this manner was handled and whether the protocols are appropriate,” Brad Witt, a legislator, said.

According to OSP, a trooper transported the bobcat then euthanized it with blunt force trauma.

“The trooper advised the Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife that he was concerned about the cat's unusual behavior and suggested euthanizing the animal for health and human safety reasons,” Casey Thomas, a captain with OSP’s Fish and Wildlife Division, said.

Many people are outraged OSP didn’t consult other agencies or choose a more humane form of euthanasia. One of the most vocal voices against OSP’s handling of the situation is Brooks Fahy, who runs a nonprofit dedicated to helping predator animals in Oregon.

Fahy testified that blunt force trauma is not humane and said OSP was more focused on killing the animal than trying to help.

“He contradicted himself, he wasn't being truthful to the committee and it was stunning,” Fahy said. “They are locked into trying to justify the killing of this animal. This was not euthanasia.”

OSP says it did follow proper protocol. It says once it determined the cat should be euthanized, it was up to the trooper’s discretion to decide how.

“The resources our troopers carry for such scenarios are limited to firearms and instruments utilized for blunt force trauma,” Thomas said. “And based upon safety considerations present at the scene, the trooper chose to euthanize the animal with one strike to the head.”

Many who oppose the euthanization point to guidelines outlined for veterinarians, which state that blunt force trauma should be used as a last resort, and mainly used for small lab animals.

Fish and Wildlife officials say these guidelines don’t always have to be followed exactly.

“They are guidelines, they're basically recommendations,” Colin Gillin, a state wildlife veterinarian, said. “They are not mandates, they are not laws.”

Legislators have decided to form a committee to look into which protocols could improve situations like this in the future. People who aren’t happy with how OSP handled the situation say they are satisfied a committee is being formed to look into better practices.

Copyright 2019 KPTV-KPDX Broadcasting Corporation. All rights reserved.

Locations

Recommended for you

(5) comments

Just curious

To bad they did not think to contact the Audobon Society for them to take care of this little critter.

FullMTLjacket

I find it hard to believe that animal control couldn't have come and used those sticks with the the noose at the end, (the ones they capture dogs with) in order to capture this animal and release it back into the wild.

Jefferson

What a waste of time. It was a wild animal tying up school and police resources; and now even more with lawyers, hearings, etc. It is no wonder that police departments in Oregon cannot find qualified applicants for the hundreds of vacancies that now exist.

Merlin

Unusual behavior? Let’s choke the OSPer and see what his behavior is.

racecar57

There is no way anyone can prove that a hard strike to the head is not as humane as a bullet to the head. Unrealistic animal worshipers get over yourself. I have seen how a animal can suffer with a bullet to the head. No one likes to see a animal suffer except for the mental ill people and I am sure this officer is not one of those people. He did what he thought was best and no one is going to be able to prove it was not better then a bullet

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.